The Ghana Gold Trap: The Realities of Gold Trading in Ghana

The Ghanaian Gold Gamble: A Cautionary Tale for Diasporans and a Call for Integrity

A Critical Guide for Diasporan Investors on Avoiding Scams and Building Authentic Partnerships

Beware of sophisticated gold scams targeting diasporan investors

The dream of trading gold in Ghana has lured countless diasporans and foreign investors, promising life-changing returns. For many, however, this dream swiftly devolves into a nightmare of financial ruin and broken trust. The stories shared on LinkedIn, expatriate forums, and in the hushed conversations of hotel lobbies in Accra paint a consistent and alarming picture: a landscape riddled with sophisticated scams that prey on the uninformed and the greedy.

This article is not just an exposé of the methods used by scammers. It is a stern critique of the short-sighted mentality that fuels this ecosystem and a crucial guide for potential buyers, urging a fundamental shift in approach from both sides of the table.

The Scammer's Playbook: Common Methods Used in Ghana

The schemes are elaborate, persuasive, and designed to exploit every vulnerability. Here are the most prevalent methods:

The "Official" Illusion and the Bait-and-Switch

This is the master scam. You are connected with an individual or a "company" that appears incredibly professional. They have an office, perhaps in East Legon or Airport Residential Area, complete with logos, business cards, and slick websites. They show you genuine-looking geological survey reports, export licenses, and even take you to a "mine" (often just a rented piece of land with dormant equipment). They may even show you a real gold bar in a secured vault as "proof of concept."

The Switch:

After you have built confidence and transferred funds for a specific, verified quantity, the story changes. Suddenly, there are "security issues," "government taxes," or "processing fees" that must be paid before the gold can be moved. Alternatively, the container is sealed, and you are pressured to pay the balance before shipment. Upon arrival at your destination, the container is filled with worthless metal, often painted brass or gold-coated tungsten, a metal dense enough to match gold's weight and fool simple tests.

The "Blessed" Gold Dust or Mercury-Gold Amalgam

A seller approaches with a compelling story of "local miners" who have gold dust. To prove authenticity, they allow you to take a sample for testing. The test, often a simple acid test or fire assay on a small sample, confirms it is real gold. What you tested, however, was a pre-prepared genuine sample. The actual shipment, which you pay for, is largely comprised of gold-coated other metals or, more insidiously, gold dust mixed with mercury. The mercury, when heated (a common method to purify gold), vaporizes, leaving behind a fraction of the expected weight and exposing you to toxic fumes.

The Government Official/Security Personnel Ruse

Scammers impersonate or claim to have deep connections with high-ranking government officials, the Precious Minerals Marketing Company (PMMC), or the police. They promise to facilitate a smooth, tax-free transaction if you pay a hefty "facilitation fee." Once the fee is paid, they disappear, or they use the illusion of official backing to make the larger gold scam seem more credible.

The Spiritual Con ("Sakawa")

Prevalent in West Africa, this method preys on superstition and greed. The scammer claims the gold is "spiritually protected" and cannot be sold without performing specific rituals for which you must pay. Alternatively, they claim your own "negative energy" is blocking the deal and a "spiritual cleansing" requiring a large cash payment is needed. While it may sound far-fetched to some, it has proven tragically effective.

A Critique of Impatience: The Ghanaian Scammer's Short-Sightedness

To the Ghanaians engaged in these practices, a severe critique is necessary. The relentless focus on short-term, predatory gain is an economic suicide pill. Every successful scam doesn't just bankrupt one foreign buyer; it destroys the confidence of a hundred potential others. It brands Ghana, a nation with immense potential and many honest, hardworking people, as a den of thieves.

The impatience to build a relationship based on trust is your greatest undoing. You see a "white" or diasporan face and see a quick score, a car to buy, a house to build. You fail to see the long-term, mutually beneficial relationship that could be built from a single honest transaction. An honest facilitator who delivers on his promises becomes the most valuable connection in the industry. He will have a queue of legitimate, trusting buyers for life. The scammer, however, is perpetually on the run, burning bridges and destroying his own name and that of his nation for a fleeting profit. Honesty is not just a moral policy; it is the most profitable long-term business strategy.

A Hard Truth for the Diasporan Buyer: Check Your Greed and Arrogance

Now, to the foreign buyers, especially the over-confident "whites" and diasporans who walk in thinking they are the smartest in the room: your arrogance and greed are the scammer's most potent weapons.

First, quit the colonial-era mindset that Africans are dumb and unaware of global prices. The individuals you are dealing with have the internet. They know the exact spot price of gold on the LBMA. The fantasy that you can land in Accra and buy gold at a 30-40% discount is not just naive; it is insulting. That very greed blinds you. The honest dealer, who quotes you a fair price reflective of the market, logistics, and a reasonable profit margin, is dismissed as "too expensive." You instead gravitate towards the scammer who promises you the impossible discount, flattering your ego and appealing to your avarice.

You distrust the honest person asking logical questions and demanding transparency, but you trust the smooth-talker with the flashy car and the mansion who tells you exactly what you want to hear. You are drawn to the spectacle, not the substance.

The Final, Non-Negotiable Advice

If you take nothing else from this article, let it be this:

Nobody has tens, hundreds, or thousands of kilos of gold sitting around, desperately looking for a buyer. Gold is the most liquid asset on the planet. If someone had 100 kilos of legitimate gold, they would not be messaging random buyers on WhatsApp or LinkedIn. The world's largest banks and refiners would be at their door. The scarcity has never been of buyers; it has always been of trusted, verified sellers and facilitators.

Beware the "Successful" African. A man who meets you flashing keys to multiple mansions and a fleet of luxury cars is not necessarily a successful gold dealer; he is a successful showman. His wealth is likely built on the capital of previous victims. The honest, successful dealer is often low-key, cautious, and focused on due diligence, not ostentation. Often, the most trustworthy individual might be the one without the flashy symbols of wealth, the one you would overlook because he doesn't fit your stereotype of "success."

In Conclusion

The Ghanaian gold market is a harsh teacher. It rewards patience, integrity, and deep local knowledge, while it ruthlessly punishes greed, arrogance, and impatience. For Ghanaians, choose the long road of honesty; it is the only path to sustainable prosperity. For buyers, check your ego at Kotoka International Airport, do your due diligence, and understand that if a deal seems too good to be true, it is almost certainly a trap laid for the greedy and the gullible.

You May Also Like

• ➤ Unity in Diversity: The Nigerian Facade
• ➤ The Biafra Archives
• ➤ The Great Somersault: How FFK Flipped the Script

BBC Africa: A Betrayal of Journalism or a Service to Paymasters?

BBC Africa's Nigerian Narrative: A Betrayal of Journalism or a Service to Paymasters?

While thousands perish, a media giant chooses obfuscation over investigation and government-approved sources over inconvenient truths.

Spitting on the Graves of the Martyrs: An autopsy of a biased report.

The BBC has long worn the mantle of global journalistic integrity. Yet, its recent article, "Are Christians being persecuted in Nigeria as Trump claims?" is not just a failure of reporting; it is a masterclass in narrative engineering, designed to dismiss a genocide through a web of insinuation, selective sourcing, and a blatant abandonment of investigative duty.

At the heart of this deceit is the treatment of a harrowing report from the International Society for Civil Liberties and Rule of Law (Intersociety), which documents the systematic killing of thousands of Nigerian Christians. The BBC's primary counter-argument? The figures are "hard to verify" and "could not be relied on." This is a breathtaking admission of incompetence, or worse, complicity.

What Happened to Investigative Journalism?

The BBC Africa desk, with its vast resources and global reach, finds itself unable to verify claims of mass murder. One must ask: what is the purpose of a media house if not to investigate precisely such claims? When a human rights organization presents data gathered on the ground, the role of a serious journalist is not to shrug and say "it's hard," but to deploy its own resources to confirm or debunk it. Did BBC Africa send reporters to the affected communities in the Middle Belt? Did they attempt to collate their own data from local hospitals, cemeteries, and survivors' testimonies?

The answer is clearly no. Instead, they chose the path of least resistance and maximum obfuscation. They demand verifiable data from a grassroots organization while offering none of their own, effectively creating a false equivalence between a detailed report and their own unsupported skepticism. This is not journalism; it is a calculated effort to cast doubt on the victims' narrative without doing the hard work to provide an alternative truth.

The Curious Case of "Mr. Christian" Ani and the Convenient Expert

Having dismissed Intersociety, the BBC then asks its readers to place their trust in Mr. Christian Ani, the Country Manager for Trend Micro. The choice is as revealing as it is absurd. Why is a cybersecurity executive with no stated expertise in demographic studies or conflict analysis presented as the authoritative voice on religious persecution?

Is it because his first name is "Christian," creating a subtle, cynical veneer of balance? Or is it because, as the Country Manager for a multinational corporation, Mr. Ani's position depends heavily on government contracts and stable relations with the very authorities accused of complicity in these atrocities? Intersociety's work requires neither profit nor government patronage, which is precisely what makes its findings so threatening to the official narrative. In contrast, a figure like Mr. Ani is institutionally inclined to downplay systemic violence that could alarm international investors and upset his government partners.

The BBC's preference for a source whose credibility is tied to the status quo over an independent civil society group exposes its bias: it prefers the comfortable narrative of the powerful over the inconvenient truth of the persecuted.

Distorting History: The Chibok Whitewash

The article's manipulation extends to historical facts. In a casual reference to the Chibok girls' abduction, the BBC deliberately omits the number of victims—276 girls—and then implies the atrocity took place in a "majority Muslim population." This is a gross distortion.

The Government Girls Secondary School in Chibok, Borno State, was located in a predominantly Christian area. Multiple reports from that time confirm that the vast majority of the abducted girls were Christian. This is a critical detail, as it underscores the religious dimension of the attack by Boko Haram, a group whose very name means "Western education is forbidden." The idea that Muslim girls would travel from their own dominated areas to a boarding school in a Christian-dominated area is, in the local context, highly improbable. By blurring these facts, the BBC sanitizes a sectarian massacre into a generic conflict, spitting on the memory of those Christian girls.

The "Clashes" Deception: When Genocide is Rebranded

Finally, the BBC perpetuates the government's most insidious lie: the framing of a systematic campaign of land-grabbing and annihilation as "herders-farmers clashes." What kind of "clash" involves the wiping out of entire communities, the burning of churches, and the renaming of villages from their indigenous titles to Islamic names? This language is a deliberate tool of denial. It manufactures a false symmetry between orchestrated attacks and desperate self-defense, masking a project of religious and cultural conquest.

The BBC Africa desk can continue to collect its envelopes—be they metaphorical from a Nigerian government desperate to control its image, or literal from a British establishment prioritizing geopolitical stability over human lives. But in doing so, it should know that it is not just reporting news; it is actively participating in a cover-up. It is spitting on the graves of hundreds of thousands of Christian martyrs whose stories it deliberately obscures, distorts, and denies. The blood of the forgotten is not just on the hands of the perpetrators, but also on the keyboards of those who refuse to tell their story.

Related Posts

• Akpabio's Shameful Deflection: Betraying the Victims for Political Expediency
• The Great Somersault: How FFK Flipped on Religious Persecution in Nigeria
• Unity in Diversity: The Facade of Nigerian Religious Harmony

Posted on October 9, 2025 | By [Your Name or Blog Name]

Akpabio’s Shameful Deflection: Betraying Nigeria’s Christians in Crisis

Will Senator Akpabio’s Silence Shield the Guilty or Expose His Complicity?

Religious Persecution Nigeria Crisis Akpabio Exposed Christian Killings Biafran Victims

In recent weeks, a chorus of voices from the United States Congress and international advocacy groups has amplified grave concerns regarding the systematic persecution and targeted killings of Christians in Nigeria. Prominent figures, including Senator Ted Cruz and Congressman Riley Moore, have publicly decried what they describe as a “mass murder” of Christians, with estimates citing over 100,000 deaths since 2009 and more than 7,000 in the past year alone. These statements, coupled with calls for redesignating Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) for religious freedom violations, underscore a pattern of violence attributed largely to radical Fulani militants and other non-state actors. Yet, in a response that has drawn sharp criticism, Senate President Godswill Akpabio has sought to deflect these allegations, framing the issue not as targeted religious persecution but as generalized insecurity affecting all Nigerians, while subtly implicating IPOB, the Biafran self-determination groups in Nigeria’s old eastern region. This maneuver not only evades accountability but also exemplifies a profound insensitivity to the victims and their communities.

The Deflection and Its Implications

Akpabio’s rebuttal, delivered during Senate proceedings, posits that violence in Nigeria transcends religious lines, citing incidents such as the 2014 Kano mosque bombing and attacks in Plateau and Katsina as evidence of indiscriminate suffering. While acknowledging the toll on both Muslims and Christians, this is a deliberate attempt to dilute what the Christian community has had to endure and continues to endure, thereby shifting focus from the predominant targeting of Christian communities. Such rhetoric serves to dilute the specificity of the crisis, portraying it as a mere byproduct of broader instability rather than a deliberate campaign against a vulnerable Christian population, vulnerable by its peaceful disposition.

This approach is particularly egregious given the context. Only an individual deeply aligned with entrenched power structures—a “Fulani puppet” in critical discourse—could so shamelessly attribute these atrocities to IPOB, a group advocating for Biafran self-determination without evidence of involvement in anti-Christian violence or any violence at all.

Blaming IPOB appeases the apparent perpetrators, including Fulani oligarchs and collaborators—the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN)—at the expense of truth and justice. This deflection constitutes the height of insensitivity toward those who have lost loved ones, as it minimizes the agony of families shattered by targeted assaults on places of worship and farming communities.

Akpabio’s Silence on Fellow Christians’ Plight and the Revelation of Hypocrisy

Compounding this insensitivity is Akpabio’s conspicuous failure to issue a categorical condemnation of the killings targeting his fellow Christians. Despite his position as Senate President and a professed Christian, public records reveal no standalone denouncement of these faith-based atrocities. Instead, his statements generalize the violence, warning against “framing insecurity along religious lines” and emphasizing mutual victimhood. This equivocation stands in stark contrast to the urgency expressed by global advocates and erodes trust in leadership from within affected communities.

To be unequivocal: IPOB bears no responsibility for the killings of Christians in Nigeria. Extensive reports from organizations like the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom and Amnesty International attribute the violence primarily to Fulani herdsmen militias and Islamist extremists, not pro-Biafran activists. Attempting to spin culpability onto IPOB is not only dishonest but intellectually bankrupt, particularly from a figure who maintains a private chapel in his residence—a space ostensibly dedicated to Christian devotion—yet remains mute on these horrors. This evasion is hardly surprising when viewed through the lens of recent disclosures by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, who represents Kogi Central. In public statements amid her own controversies with Akpabio—including allegations of workplace harassment—Akpoti-Uduaghan highlighted the Senate President’s home chapel not as a bastion of Christian piety but as emblematic of personal contradictions. It is obvious that the home-built chapel honors the goddess Aphrodite, a classical deity of lust and sex, rather than Jesus Christ—a claim that underscores a profound disconnect between Akpabio’s professed faith and his actions.

Biafrans as Primary Victims: A Demographic Reality

Understanding the depth of this betrayal requires contextualizing the demographics of Nigeria’s Biafran region, encompassing the predominantly Igbo southeast. This area boasts over 90% Christian adherence, rendering it a focal point for religious persecution. Beyond their homeland, Biafrans form the second-largest population group in other regions, surpassed only by indigenous populations, which amplifies their exposure to intercommunal and faith-motivated violence.

Consequently, Biafrans emerge as among the highest victims of Christian-targeted killings nationwide—second only to indigenous Christians in non-southeast regions. They are not perpetrators but enduring targets, their advocacy through IPOB a cry for protection rather than aggression. Any narrative implicating them in these crimes distorts reality and perpetuates injustice.

Toward Accountability and Justice

The international spotlight on Nigeria’s Christian persecutions offers a pivotal moment for introspection. Senator Akpabio’s deflections, rooted in political expediency, betray the very constituents he serves and dishonor the memory of the slain. True leadership demands unequivocal condemnation of targeted violence, recognition of Biafrans as victims rather than villains, and reforms to dismantle the networks enabling these atrocities. As global pressure mounts—with Nigerian lawmakers planning a U.S. delegation—Nigeria must confront this crisis head-on, lest the silence of figures like Akpabio echo as complicity.

Demand Justice: Akpabio Must Answer for His Silence!

Join the call for accountability! Share this post and demand action against religious persecution in Nigeria.

Justice for Christians Senate Betrayal Fulani Militants IPOB Misblamed

The Great Somersault: How FFK Flipped His Narrative on Christian Killings

The FFK Dossier: A Decade of Commentary on Nigeria's Christian Killings

A chronological deep-dive into Femi Fani-Kayode's X (Twitter) posts from 2012 to 2025, documenting his persistent narrative on violence targeting Christians and his dramatic September 2025 reversal.

#NigerianPolitics #FFK #ReligiousViolence #ChristianPersecution #GenocideWatch #PoliticalSomersault

Femi Fani-Kayode (@realFFK), a prominent Nigerian politician and former Minister, has been a vocal commentator on the violence plaguing Nigeria. For over a decade, his X platform has been a megaphone for describing attacks on Christian communities as "genocide," "ethnic cleansing," and "mass murder," primarily attributing them to Fulani militants, Boko Haram, and ISWAP.

The timeline below compiles his most significant posts, formatted to mirror their original X appearance for clarity and impact.

The Timeline: A Decade of Accusations (2012 - 2025)

FFK

Femi Fani-Kayode

@realFFK

June 18, 2012

".@maxsiollun in that case the killing of christians must stop and the govt must stop BH. If they do not Nigeria will eventually explode."

🔗 Citation: [post:76] | This early post highlights his view of the killings as escalating toward national collapse.

FFK

Femi Fani-Kayode

@realFFK

Jan 30, 2017

"You complain about @realDonaldTrump's travel ban on Muslims but remain silent about the genocide of Christians in Nigeria. Shame on you!"

🔗 Citation: [post:75] | He criticizes global hypocrisy on Christian persecution.

FFK

Femi Fani-Kayode

@realFFK

Dec 7, 2017

"If you think this is bad come to southern Kaduna in northern Nigeria and see what happens to the indigenous Christians that live there. Muslim Fulani militants and herdsmen butchered 809 of them in their homes on Christmas day last year!Not one of the killers has been arrested."

🔗 Citation: [post:0] | Highlighting impunity.

FFK

Femi Fani-Kayode

@realFFK

Apr 28, 2018

"3 forces are responsible for the genocide, carnage, ethnic cleansing and mass murder that we see in Nigeria today. Boko Haram, the Fulani herdsmen and the Nigerian Army. Collectively they have killed hundreds of thousands over the last 3 years. @MBuhari controls all three."

🔗 Citation: [post:31] | Accusing the president of oversight.

FFK

Femi Fani-Kayode

@realFFK

Jun 14, 2019

"Nigeria has had more Christians murdered, more Churches bombed and burnt and more clerics slaughtered than ANY other country in the world over the last 58 years."

🔗 Citation: [post:5]

🚨 The September 2025 Somersault

For years, FFK's commentary consistently called for international attention to what he framed as a genocide against Christians. However, on September 30, 2025, his narrative shifted dramatically after After hearing the starter's pistol sound of their WhatsApp group admin, the APC-Tinubu disinformation agent, and a popular conspiracy entrepreneur, David Hundeyin and other APC-Tinubu disinformation apparatus.

FFK

Femi Fani-Kayode

@realFFK

Sep 29, 2025

"Bill Maher, the Jewish-controlled American media, and the American Deep State have said the world should 'forget Gaza' and instead 'focus on Nigeria,' where, according to them, '500,000 Christians have been killed in the last year.' This is a lie and a false narrative... It is the beginning of an insidious attempt to discredit and demonize our country, divide us on religious lines, destabilize us... We must resist it."

🔗 Citation: [post:4] | Dismissing disinformation while defending against anti-Nigeria bias.

This post marked a complete reversal, refuting the very kind of statistics and international focus he had long championed, now framing it as an attack on national sovereignty.

FFK

Femi Fani-Kayode

@realFFK

Sep 28, 2025

"The allegation... that 500,000 Christians were murdered by Muslims in Nigeria in the last one year is false. It is disinformation... These terrorists make no distinction... They are attempting to kill us ALL, whether Christian or Muslim..."

🔗 Citation: [post:1] | Refuting exaggerated claims but acknowledging ongoing killings of both faiths.

Analysis: Fani-Kayode's commentary, spanning over a decade, reveals a consistent pattern of highlighting violence against Christians, often using incendiary language. His sudden pivot in late September 2025 to a more unifying, nationalist rhetoric—dismissing exaggerated figures and emphasizing that terrorists kill both Christians and Muslims—represents a significant shift in his public stance, aligning more closely with the narrative of the current administration and marking one of the most notable political somersaults in recent Nigerian political discourse.

Compiled from direct X (Twitter) posts, essays, and media statements. All citations refer to internal post identifiers from the original compilation.

Sheath The Sword: Like A Child Swinging A Blade, You Risk Hurting Yourself And Others.

Sheath The Sword: A Lament for Unity in Our Struggle

A Reflection on the Cost of Division and a Call to Collective Action

By Mazi Ogbuefi | August 16, 2025

Introduction

In a struggle as profound and costly as ours, it is deeply saddening to witness men and women—adults who should know better—engage in actions that undermine our collective purpose. These are individuals who have seen the toll of our fight firsthand: hundreds, if not thousands, have lost their lives for this higher cause. Countless others endure self-imposed exile, separated from their homeland. Thousands of children have been rendered fatherless or motherless, couples torn apart, and many who remain dare not visit or even call their families, unable to attend the burials of loved ones. The weight of these sacrifices is immense, yet it is disheartening to see some among us—many of whom are "old boys and girls" of this struggle—resort to creating and fanning distractions of all kinds, magnitudes, and ramifications.

The Cost of Distractions

These distractions, often fueled by ego, seem designed to stroke personal pride or revel in fleeting moments of perceived success. But this so-called success comes at a grave cost. It derails our movement, endangers lives, and delays the collective victory we strive for. When you dig deeper and ask questions, you uncover a troubling truth: at the heart of these energy-draining distractions are individuals we once respected, and some we still hold in high esteem. This realization prompts a cascade of questions: Why? To what end? Is it egocentrism? A need to assert control or prove they can disrupt our progress? Is it a desperate bid to maintain relevance, garner attention, or establish themselves as worthy adversaries? Whatever their motivations, none of these reasons serve our collective good. These individuals are intelligent enough to understand the impact of their actions—or inactions—on our ultimate goal. So, what truly drives them?

“Like a child swinging a blade, you risk hurting yourself and others.”

A Shadow-Web of Melancholy

Lately, I have found myself caught in a shadow-web of melancholy, a deep, reflective sadness that permeates my mood. As I take stock of the days, weeks, and months past, I’ve begun to understand the source of this emotional weight. It stems from the foolish and immature behavior of those who should be shining examples of sacrifice and commitment to our collective objective. True maturity in this struggle does not hinge on who is in charge or what role one plays. It is defined by a willingness to prioritize the right thing—regardless of personal gain or recognition. But what is the "right thing"? Who decides? Must it always align with our personal desires or methods? If an action serves our collective good with minimal repercussions, it is right for us. Our enemies are clear, our adversaries well-defined. To instigate or fuel anything that takes our focus off this fight is not only selfish, cruel, and insensitive—it is, to put it plainly, stupid.

The Stakes of Division

The consequences of such distractions are far-reaching. Some among us will endure them, others will fight against them, and many will be left confused. But have we considered those who might grow cold feet, doubting whether their safety and the well-being of this family—our movement—are being prioritized? The objective of our struggle is survival and a better life, not just for ourselves but for those who will come after us. Have those fanning these flames of discord paused to reflect on the fact that dying for the struggle should be the ultimate sacrifice, a price of last resort? If they had, they would not so willingly endanger the lives of others just to prove a point—unless, of course, they are, in reality, sworn enemies of our cause.

A Call to Sheath the Sword

To those childishly wielding this sword of division, I implore you: sheath it. Like a child swinging a blade, you risk hurting yourself and others. Let us put our freedom first. Let us remember the cost of our struggle—the lives lost, the families broken, the futures deferred—and recommit to the collective good. Our fight is not for personal glory or fleeting moments of relevance. It is for survival, for legacy, for the promise of a better tomorrow.

Join the Fight for Unity

Let us focus on the real enemies we face and overcome the distractions that threaten to tear us apart. Share your thoughts and commit to our collective freedom. Our future depends on it.

Share on X

About the Author

Mazi Ogbuefi is a passionate writer sharing African stories and reflections at obasiafrica.com. His work explores the struggles, sacrifices, and hopes of a people united for a better future.

Share this post: X | Facebook

This is Nigeria: The Land of Unbridled Double Standards

Unveiled: Nigeria’s Hidden Bias Against the Eastern Region

Nigeria’s systemic inequalities run deep, especially for those from the old Eastern Region. Is the dream of Biafra the only path to justice and dignity? Dive into the truth.

A Tale of Two Justices

In Nigeria, a stark reality persists for those hailing from the old Eastern Region—whether from the South-South, often viewed by the ruling oligarchs as a "conquered" territory, or the South-East, defiantly deemed "never to be conquered." To the powers that be, you are simply a Biafran. The sooner this truth dawns, the better.

Consider a recent incident at Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport in Abuja on August 5, 2025. A sacred cow of Nigeria’s elite acted with impunity, holding an entire flight hostage. Government appointees flooded social media with the tired refrain, “to err is human,” excusing the powerful.

The Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) swiftly suspended the flight’s captain and pilot, shielding their identities. Could this secrecy hide their Biafran heritage?

Disparity in Discipline

Wasiu Ayinde, a Yoruba Fuji musician, faced no immediate sanctions for his misconduct. Only after public outcry and intervention by Festus Keyamo did the NCAA impose a six-month flight ban on Ayinde for disrupting a commercial flight and violating aviation protocols. Yet, tribal government officials conveniently excluded the pilot and captain from their chorus of “to forgive is divine,” revealing deep-seated bias.

Contrast this with Comfort Emmanson, a woman from the old Eastern Region. She was swiftly detained, assaulted, and publicly humiliated—her privacy violated with images published online—following allegations of violent conduct. Branded guilty without due process, she was sent to Kirikiri prison and banned for life from flying.

Whose Justice Prevails?

Assuming Emmanson was guilty, which is worse: her alleged unruly behavior or Ayinde’s act of obstructing a commercial aircraft? Ayinde’s actions posed a far greater threat to public safety, yet he initially received leniency—a mere slap on the wrist—while Emmanson faced immediate, harsh repercussions.

Why does justice in Nigeria seem to favor one group over another? The answer lies in a system that treats Easterners as second-class citizens.

This disparity raises a critical question: why does Nigeria’s justice system appear so selective? The message is clear: as long as you remain under this union, you will always be treated as second-class.

The Case for Biafra

The emergence of Biafra is not just a desire; it is a necessity for survival, dignity, and true freedom. Ignoring this truth means accepting a system that perpetually marginalizes you. If you choose to stay silent, you forfeit the right to complain about Nigeria’s injustices.

Join the Conversation—Subscribe for Weekly Insights!

Featured Reads

Unchained: The Ruthless Path to Liberation

Explore the unyielding fight for freedom and justice in Nigeria’s complex socio-political landscape.

Read More

Mazi Nnamdi Kanu: I Agitate for Biafra

A deep dive into the motivations and struggles behind the Biafran movement.

Read More

Unity in Diversity: The Facade of Nigerian Unity

Uncover the myths and realities of Nigeria’s so-called unity in diversity.

Read More

Unchained: To Overcome Evil, You Must Yourself—And of Yourself—Become the Greater Evil.

 

Unchained: The Ruthless Path to Liberation

In a world where evil reigns—where oppression is worn as a crown and dominance is built on the subjugation of the weak—survival does not reward virtue. The game is rigged; the rules are written in blood. To break free, to rise from the chains meant to bury you, you cannot afford to play the ‘better person.’ The meek inherit nothing but dust.

What you need is to become worse. Not just strong, but ruthless. Not just cunning, but unapologetically dominant. The oppressor’s power thrives on the compliance of the broken; their reign lasts only as long as their victims hesitate to strike back. To overthrow them, you must outplay them at their own game—not with their morals, but with your own unbending will.

Only when you stand unchained, when their boot is no longer on your neck, can you rebuild the world as you see fit. A fountain cannot rise above its source—so if you seek true change, you must first become the storm that washes away the old order and then usher in a world where survival doesn’t require becoming what you despise. Remember, To "unchain" yourself from moral limits is to gain power but lose innocence. if there is ever a time, that time is now!

Inspired by Mazi Jonathan Chinedu @IPOB Community Radio

~MAZI OGBUEFI ©2025~

Featured Posts

• The Messenger Must Never Become the Message
• Debunking Misguided Attacks on Nnamdi
• Message of Caution to Latter-Day

Labels: Liberation Oppression Resilience

When the Chimney Became Holy: A Satire on Blind Faith

The Chimney Conundrum: A Satirical Look at Religious Blindness

“These Christians will be told by a preacher or the good book, ‘Look into the Chimney and you shall be filled with joy!’” 😂😂😂

Below lies the tragicomedy of religious interpretation—where logic goes up in smoke..

The imaginary dialogue below exposes the dangers of blind faith and how religion can mislead the vast majority. Let’s break it down.

The Ignoramuses and Illiterate

The first group, the Ignoramuses and Illiterate, will gasp, “WOW!” They’ll weave “Chimney” into songs of exaltation and exhortation because, to them, it sounds like the name of a deity, a blessed place, or some heavenly ideal. 🤣🤣🤣

The Educated Faithfools

Next up are the Educated Faithfools, a family of the “Only Believe” Brigades. They’ll sigh and quote scripture to dodge scrutiny: “The secret things belong unto the LORD our God” (Deuteronomy 29:29), or they’ll smugly whisper, “The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit… for they are foolishness unto him” (1 Corinthians 2:14). These are their go-to verses when they can’t explain what they believe—and know deep down it makes zero sense. Hahaha!

The Academic Theologian Faithfools

Then we have the Academic Theologian Faithfools, another branch of the “Only Believe” Brigades. These folks will dissect the etymology of “Chimney” to justify their beliefs. If that fails? They dive straight into the “original languages”! “Aha! In Greek, ‘pýle’ (gate) was mistranslated as ‘Chimney’ in some manuscripts!” or “The Hebrew ‘Ashan’ (smoke) shares root letters with ‘Oshan’ (treasure portal)!” 📚✝️

With these mental gymnastics, they convince—and confuse—themselves, all to keep the wheel of oppression turning. Admitting their error would mean questioning the infallibility of the imaginary author of the “good book.” Rather than face that, they’d prefer to perish and lead others into the same pit, clinging to the notion that they’ve been following divine truth instead of human invention.

The Thinkers

Then come The Thinkers, scratching their heads: “Hold up… Chimney? Like… the soot pipe? How ‘doth’ that bring joy? Nay, this maketh no sense!” ❓🕵️‍♂️

The Chorus of Condemnation

All the other groups—the Ignoramuses, the Educated Faithfools, and the Academic Theologian Faithfools—unite in one voice against the Thinkers: “They don’t have faith!” At the end of the day, these groups represent the majority, at least 75%, and the damage is done. The evidence is plain for the blind to see.

The Final Judgment

And so, all other factions join in a chorus of judgment against the Thinkers and every voice of reason: “They lack FAITH!” Truly, as they love to quote, “The wisdom of this world is foolishness with God” (1 Corinthians 3:19). Verily, these are the majority (75%+!), and thus the damage is done. “The evidence lieth plain before the blind.” ✋😔

~MAZI OGBUEFI ©2025~

The GMO Faust Bargain: Trading Our Future for ‘No-Stress’ Lies

Don’t be a modern-day Faust

In 16th-century German lore, the scholar Johann Faust traded his soul to the devil for limitless knowledge and earthly pleasures. For years, he reveled in power—until the debt came due. His short-term gains doomed him to eternal torment.

Today, we repeat Faust's error with GMOs: trading ecological sovereignty for the illusion of "stress-free" food. Like Faust, we ignore the fine print:

One day, dem go bring palm nut wey no get seed, una go jump dey happy because now you fit cook your ofeakwu WITHOUT STRESS. The emphasis on the "WITHOUT STRESS", without stress here mean a lot of things, such as: Lazy, comfort, short term satisfaction and selfishness with zero peep 👀 into the future by asking the critical questions.

If this one has no seed (kernel) and we use am along with the local one, won't people stop farming the one with the seed? Because if I don't buy and others too don't buy, won't it mean that there will be no longer a market for the local seeded palm nuts? Won't that then mean a total elimination of the local species?

A fool will say, "and so what?" Who even need dat one? I want soft life ooo, I no wan suffer.

Until someone else who was not even aware nor affected – and as a result, the timing of their thinking process was somewhat late – but manages to ask, "So this palm nut wey no get seed... I mean kernel, na how una dey use plant am?"

Then una go laugh haaaard one because of how mumu you think say di question be (for your mind) – read the next part in the voice and mannerism of Raymond Reddington (James Spader) 🤣🤣🤣

"... and just before she stops laughing, the Prefrontal Cortex inhibitory control will set in and perform one of the nature's most magnificent but often underappreciated neurological wonders by rapidly applying inhibitory brakes to the emotional motor pathways in split seconds! What a wonder of nature."

Then there will be impulsive coughing followed by silence, a momentary loss of hearing and memory, followed by "Wwh what? What did you just ask me? Can you please say it again? I never think am ooo..." Then and only then will YOU begin to realize the depth of the pit YOU have dug for herself and your future generations to come.

And by then it is always too late, because at that stage, dem don buy all the palm kernel dem and we have willingly sold them to buy the seedless ones for easy life. And finally UNA go come figure am out that these seedless ones are produced in a lab and harmful to you, and when some of your relatives complain, your master's errand boy will say: "Instead not to eat and die, it is better to eat and die."

Make of this what you wish, the message has been passed and delivered to those willing to pay for its delivery.

The Messenger Must Never Become the Message: A Historical Reflection for Today’s Vigilance

THE MESSENGER MUST NEVER BECOME THE MESSAGE: A HISTORICAL REFLECTION FOR TODAY’S VIGILANCE



History has a cruel pattern: the moment a messenger becomes the message; the cause is lost. The revolutionary is no longer a voice for the oppressed but a hollow idol—worshipped by ignorant foreigners, manipulated by cunning elites, and abandoned by the very people they were sent to liberate. From Jesus Christ to Nelson Mandela, we see the same tragedy: the messenger, once feared by the powerful, is rebranded into a harmless symbol, stripped of his true mission, and used to perpetuate the very oppression he fought against. The people get a hero to admire, while the system remains untouched.

From Jesus (rejected by the Jews but adored by the Romans, who crucified him) to Mandela (abandoned by his cause, turned into a global mascot for "peace" without justice), the pattern is clear.


Jesus began his ministry with a clear mission. He declared:

"I am not sent but ONLY unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." (Matthew 15:24, KJV)

This statement reflected his prophetic calling—to restore the covenant between God and the Jewish people. His teachings in synagogues, his healing of the sick, and his challenges to religious elites aligned with the expectations of a Jewish prophet. His mission was well-defined.

But as his influence grew, the focus shifted from his message to his person. In Luke 4:16-23, Jesus stood in the synagogue, read from Isaiah, and declared:

"Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing."

The Jews, recognising the gravity of his claim (fulfilling Isaiah’s prophecy), questioned:

"Isn’t this Joseph’s son?"

At first, they believed—because his words came from a trusted prophet. But as his ministry expanded, his claims grew bolder, alienating the very people he was sent to save.

In John 14:6, he declared:

"I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me."

This was no longer just prophetic—it positioned him as the only path to God, a direct challenge to Jewish monotheism. The result? Rejection.

As John 1:11 records:

"He came unto his own, and his own received him not."

The Jews rejected Jesus not only because of their disbelief but also due to their inability to accept such an audacious claim from someone they considered ordinary.

Today, Jesus is worshipped globally, except by the Jews he was sent to. While a small minority (Messianic Jews) accept him, most reject his deification because the message got lost in the messenger.

Nelson Mandela: From Revolutionary to Symbol of Compromise

Mandela's journey follows a similar path. He spent 27 years in prison fighting apartheid but emerged not as a militant liberator but as a symbol of reconciliation, manipulated to maintain the status quo.

South African activist Andile Mngxitama noted:

"People celebrate the Nelson Mandela who went to prison, not the one who came out."

Upon his release in 1990, the struggle shifted from justice, land redistribution, and dismantling white economic dominance to focus on Mandela himself. Pressured to distance himself from Winnie Mandela, portrayed as "unruly" to undermine the ANC's radical vision, Mandela complied, moving from Robben Island to the homes of his former oppressors.

The media hailed him as a symbol of "peaceful coexistence", overshadowing the unmet promises of the struggle. Consequently, South Africa remains one of the world's most unequal societies, where people have a symbol of freedom but lack real justice.

As more South Africans realize this reality, Mandela's supporters diminish. If he had remained resolute, there might not be a need for someone like Julius Malema today.

Conclusion: The Danger of Idolizing the Messenger

When the messenger overshadows the message, movements are co-opted.

• · Jesus' teachings were watered down into a religion serving an empire.

• · Mandela's revolution was simplified into a heartwarming tale of reconciliation devoid of justice.

True liberation demands vigilance against idolizing individuals and distorting movements into cults of personality. Elevating the messenger above the message jeopardizes the cause, with history demonstrating that it is always the people who bear the consequences.



~MAZI OGBUEFI ©2025~

The Misplaced Priorities of Igbo Elites: Ego Over Progress

 The Igbo community, often celebrated for its entrepreneurial spirit and resilience, is once again shooting itself in the foot with a display of shortsightedness that borders on absurdity. While the world moves toward innovation and economic transformation, some of our so-called leaders, are busy chasing vanity projects that stroke egos rather than uplift our people. The recent controversy surrounding his alleged plan to build a 50-acre “Igbo Village” in Old Ningo, Ghana, is a glaring example of this misguided obsession with personal glory over collective progress. Meanwhile, the Chinese business community has quietly acquired 125

acres in Adenta, Ghana, to build a one-stop industrial and market area with a tech hub—a move that screams strategic vision while our own “big men” play in the sandbox of self-aggrandizement.

Let’s be clear: the idea of an “Igbo Village” reeks of a lone-wolf mentality that prioritizes cultural showboating over economic empowerment. Mazi Ihenetu, crowned in 2012 as the symbolic leader of Igbos in Ghana, has defended this project as a way to preserve Igbo heritage, complete with a palace, a 2,000-seater auditorium, and streets named after Igbo icons. Sounds noble, doesn’t it? But dig deeper, and it’s a hollow gesture—a shrine to ego disguised as cultural pride. 

While the “Eze” insists his role is ceremonial and unifying, the backlash from Ghanaians, who see it as a foreign intrusion on their chieftaincy system, exposes the disconnect. 

Contrast this with the Chinese, who aren’t wasting time building cultural monuments in foreign lands. Their 125-acre acquisition in Adenta is a masterstroke of economic foresight. This isn’t about erecting statues or naming streets after ancestors; it’s about creating a hub for industry, trade, and technology that will generate jobs, foster innovation, and integrate Ghana into global value chains. The Chinese understand what many of our Igbo elites don’t: real power lies in economic infrastructure, not in parading titles or building villages that serve as little more than photo ops for the wealthy.

This isn’t just about Eze Ihenetu. It’s a symptom of a broader disease among Igbo elites—a braggadocio culture that values flash over substance. We see it in Nigeria, where rich Igbos pour billions into lavish village mansions that stand empty most of the year, and Hotels to aid their illicit activities, while our markets, schools, and industries crumble. 

The same mindset drives the Eze’s vision: a 50-acre monument to Igbo pride in Ghana, while Igboland itself bleeds from neglect, insecurity, and lack of investment. 

Why build a village in exile when our homeland desperately needs factories, tech hubs, and infrastructure? 

Why channel resources into projects that glorify individuals when we could be creating opportunities for the masses?

The Igbo spirit of independence, often our greatest asset, becomes our Achilles’ heel when it morphs into this selfish, lone-wolf mentality. We’re so busy proving we’re “better” than others that we forget to collaborate for the greater good. 

The Chinese in Adenta aren’t just building a tech hub; they’re building a legacy of economic dominance. Meanwhile, our elites are stuck in a cycle of one-upmanship, where the size of your palace or the grandeur of your title matters more than the number of jobs you create or lives you transform.

It’s time for a reality check. If we, as Igbos, want to compete in a globalized world, we must shed this obsession with ego-driven projects. Let’s take a page from the Chinese playbook: invest in systems that empower communities, not individuals. Let’s build factories, not palaces; tech hubs, not auditoriums. Eze Ihenetu and his ilk need to wake up. The world isn’t clapping for our cultural displays—it’s moving forward while we’re busy stroking our egos in villages that lead nowhere.

~MAZI OGBUEFI ©2025~